The odd part here is that the pipeline works completely fine, including triggers. The pipelines run perfectly fine, however I get a "Some recent issues detected related to pipeline trigger." warning at the top of the pipeline summary page and viewing details only states: "Configuring the trigger failed, edit and save the pipeline again." I have run in to an odd problem after converting a bunch of my YAML pipelines to use templates for holding job logic as well as for defining my pipeline variables. If you have an object created as type MostDerived: The most-derived object of d_obj is an object of type Derived. Again, complete is not synonymous with most-derived.Īlso if I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), Is the object d_obj is also a "most-derived" object? This is not necessarily a complete object, however, since this could be a class member definition. The most-derived object of b_obj is an object of type Base. So if I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), Is the object b_obj is "most-derived" object?
Every complete object of class-type is a most-derived object only if that class inherits.Objects may be of class type, but non-class type objects also exist. A most-derived object is an object of a most-derived class, and a most-derived class must be of a class type. Is every "complete" object is "most-derived" object If I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), is the object d_obj also a "most-derived" object?ĭoes the word "derived" in "most-derived" mean that the object is an object of a class like MostDerived, or mean that the object has no class subobject in it? If I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), is the object b_obj a "most-derived" object? Per the question "What does the "most derived object" mean?" I think that (correct me if I am wrong), objects of type "most-derived" class only, like MostDerived, are called "most-derived" objects. I stopped here, I really do not understand the rest of the wording. If a complete object, a member subobject, or an array element is of class type, its type is considered the most derived class An object of a most derived class type or of a non-class type is called a most derived object.įrom the quote what I understand is that a type of a complete object is of "most-derived" class type. Sir Edward Grey ( talk) 04:35, J(UTC) You should not use !important for elements which can occur in articles.I can't understand the wording in this quote from the standard: Math magician ƒ (♫) 03:55 UTC, Wed, 18 July 2012 Yeah, I do ) It's all perfect now.
WIKITABLE LIGHTTABLE WIKIA CODE
So what I'm wondering now is, will this be fixed, or are we going to have to go and change the table class on every single table on every single page to make the tables look decent again? If so, could someone please let me know the code format of what the style used to be (and out of curiosity, where to see what the current styles of all the table classes are - also just to see what other styles are pre-made and available to use?) - and I might put that into a I've left it a while to see if someone was fixing it by default, since no-one wants a global style-change done when styles were selected and matched to their wikis, but it hasn't been fixed yet. I'm sure on many wikis the new color style looks fine, but on w:c:ParadiseIslandHD it doesn't - we (as I assume nay other wiki sites did too) chose this class because of its standardised style, border, colors, spacing, padding, etc, etc, and the colors suited very well our theme.īut now the Header color blends in with our them's background, giving the header-cells a wahsed-out / bleached look compared to the data-cells, instead of standing-out as they used to / are meant to. It's great to be rolling out performance enhancements and improvements, but I don't understand why global class styles were changed also?Īs in - why was the Header color of the wikitable class changed? Do not add to unless it really needs a response. Information in this thread may be out of date. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Note: This topic has been unedited for 3733 days.
0 kommentar(er)
